OBSESSIONS OF BERLIN
Paul Mattick - 1948
As against the terror of the bombs, the actual conquest of Berlin was of lesser
significance to its inhabitants. Nevertheless, the artillery tore new holes into
the ruins, shot away parts of the surviving buildings, killed many people
running for food and water. The spray of machine guns is visible almost on every
house, every floor, every apartment door. The tanks ground down the streets and
sidewalks. The battle was fought section by section, street by street, house by
house. It is said that sixty thousand Russians died in the struggle for Berlin.
The estimate may be incorrect, but it reveals the ferocity of the struggle.
There are no guesses on the German losses. They lost everything-particularly,
however, their illusions about the Russians.
The Russians are Berlin's second
great obsession. The rape of the city is burned deep into the minds of its
inhabitants because it is associated with their greatest disappointment. Long
before the fall of the city, refugees from the East told horrible stories about
the Russians' behavior. So did the radio. But wishful thinking discounted these
stories as exaggerations and propaganda. At any rate, it could not get worse
than it was. The same hope that welcomed Hitler in exchange for the depression
welcomed now the Russians in exchange for the bombings.
Berliners who had once belonged to
the Communist Party, or sympathized with it, looked upon the Russian conquerors
as their liberators. Their disappointment was consequently greater than that
experienced by the great mass of apolitical people and passive Nazis. Even the
less exposed Nazis hoped for a quick fall of the city in order to escape a fight
that no longer made sense. The more realistic among them killed their families
and themselves.
And there were those who had
welcomed the Allied bombers in the hope that the misery in their wake would lead
to revolt. But the terror-machine of the Nazis proved to be stronger than the
despair of the people. The atomization of the masses was sufficiently advanced
to allow the organized terroristic minority to control all situations. But with
the Russians at the gates of Berlin, defeatism became more widespread. With the
Russians within the city, revolt became possible. But the Russians were not
interested; they did not look for help but for loot.
The loot had been promised to the
Russian troops-mostly made up of Mongolians-as the price for taking the city.
The women were among the spoils. Despite the disaffection within the German
ranks, the fight for Berlin took longer than was expected, the Russian losses
were greater than contemplated. The barbarism of the Russian troops is now
excused by the ferocity of the Nazi defense that enranged the Russian soldiers.
Their rage, it is explained, could not be controlled; it took some time before
the Commissars were able to bring order into the chaos and deprive the
individual soldier of his right to rape, steal, and kill, in favor of the
systematic expropriation executed by the army in the name of the state.
The Nazi stalwarts had the choice
of dying fighting or committing suicide. They found it easier to get killed.
They hated the Russians and they had no love for the Germans. Whoever was not
with them in this last battle was their enemy. Unwilling adolescents and feeble
old men were forced into the Volkssturm. Those who could not handle a
gun, or manipulate a hand-grenade, were kept busy building barricades. Refusal
to work or to fight led to immediate execution. Everywhere the defeatists were
hanging on the lantern posts. Attempts to cut them down were again punished by
death.
The luck of battle shifted from day
to day, sometimes from hour to hour. The unwilling soldiers of the Volkssturm
threw their guns away as soon as the Russians entered their street, only to pick
them up again when they were driven back. They would be killed either way: by
the Russians if found with a weapon in their hands, by the Nazis if found
without their guns. But in the final stages of the battle more and more Germans
joined the Russians in the hunting down and killing of the Nazis. They tore down
the barricades they had erected to slow the Russian advance. They helped take
care of snipers. They recognized the Nazis who had shed their uniforms, and
destroyed them. They improvised red flags, reorganized the Communist Party,
occupied the apartments of Nazi party-members, plundered and killed on their own
account.
However, the Russians refused to
distinguish between Nazis and anti-Nazis; all Germans were fascists and
capitalists. They even outlawed their own German Communist Party, only to allow
its legal reorganization at a much later date-with the arrival of Wilhelm Pick
and his Moscow-picked retinue-so as to have an additional weapon of control. It
would not do in May 1945 to offer a Russian soldier a brotherly embrace. He
needed just to see the "luxury" of a radio, watch, or couch to be
convinced that he was not dealing with a Tovarisch but with a capitalist. At any
rate, as he was out to loot, he was not interested in probing the personal
history and social position of his victim.
The rape of Berlin was not the
aftermath of the struggle but part of it. The fight was less a military affair
than a gigantic raid of a million-fold army of bandits. Even the appearance of
the Russian soldiers ceased to be military; they discarded filthy and torn parts
of their uniforms for German civilian clothes. They wore two and three suits
under the military blouses and pants. Hardly able to walk, they advanced from
street to street, tommy-gun in one hand and a suitcase of loot in the other. The
bayonet broke open closets and drawers; what was removable was taken, only to be
lost again to the Commissars who organized the eastward track of the previously
westward Nazi caravans of plunder.
In great demand, of course, were
things that could be carried on the body, such as watches and jewelry of all
descriptions. As the victory must be celebrated, schnapps and vodka were also in
great demand. Every bottle of vinegar was opened and tasted before the Russians
accepted their possessors' protestation that they contained no alcohol. And with
the schnapps the fighting and thievery gained in elan. Those who could not
deliver quickly enough were shot down; women, not willing to give in at once,
were thrown out of the windows with their throats slit. Fires were set to the
houses that yielded too little, their occupants fleeing the basements into the
deadly cross-fires of the streets.
During the battle, the interval
between life and death is the occasion for love. Stopped for days at a
particular spot, there was time for enjoyment before the sniper's bullet found
its mark. Women and girls dragged from their basements were lined up on the
sidewalks. They tried to make themselves appear old and ugly by smearing their
faces with soot and by dirtying the shabby rags they wore in the cellars. But a
soldier's hand would wipe away the filth and discover good looks behind the mask
of fear. Children would follow their mothers and sisters, only to see them
ordered to bend over and lift their skirts to make ready for love in daylight
and collectivity, to be loved by drunken soldiers still able, however, to keep
an eye on the rooftops so as not to be killed in the act of copulation. Long
afterwards, the smaller of the children would play the newly-learned "game
of raping."
The end of the battle is the start
of the clean-up period. Groups of Russians began looking for strayed German
soldiers; systematically, house by house, block by block. Nights, they returned
to be rewarded for their day's troubles. The dead women, sprawling on the
streets with their throats cut from ear to ear, served as a terrible reminder
not to refuse the victors. The soldiers took what they found, regardless of age.
Years without furloughs, years of war and nothing but war, had given them a
great and indiscriminate appetite. Lucky the woman who aroused the fancy of an
officer who would take charge of her and thus protect her from the mob. For
others there was just the command "stay down .... comrade comes." It
was like in an army brothel; only the experience was missing, and the husband
looked on, and the children were not spared. And there was always the fear of
death. If the lights suddenly went out, the Russian might start shooting. If the
lights suddenly went on, he might also shoot, always suspicious of being
trapped, of being tricked, of being surprised by a god-damned German swine.
Of course there are also other
stories; stories of the kind Russian soldier who stopped in his fight just to
help an old lady cross the street. Stories of the crying Russian soldier killing
an old couple to end their useless and hopeless misery. Of the baby-lover,
forcing a can of milk down the throat of a terrified child. Of those that took
from one German to give to another. Of the Commissar killing the rapist on the
spot, and the officer belaboring the plunderer with his saber. No doubt, these
stories are as true as the cruel ones. But the unpredictability of the Russians'
behavior merely increased the fear. Life and death depended on their caprices;
it gave the terror a particularly bitter flavor. And when all is said, there
remains the fact that within two months Berlin was thoroughly plundered. What
was not securely hidden had been taken, most of the women had been mishandled,
and the majority of the population had been reduced to paupers.
II
Apparently it was true that the
soldiers had lost their discipline. Long after the battle searching parties
continued to look in the basements and ruins. They looked no longer for Nazis
but for Russians. And they have been looking for deserters ever since; most of
the Razzias that take place in Berlin have as their first objective the
hunt for former Russian soldiers. Troops were shifted, the Mongolians retreated
to the hinterland; new soldiers arrived. Too late for the great show they were
now forced to buy their women with bread and their bicycles with worthless
vouchers and German Marks they had picked up in banks and post-offices.
But the troops were still living
with the Germans. What kind of people were these Russians? Had they been so
totally demoralized by years of campaigning, that they forgot all the so-called
civilized ways of behavior? Or did they come from Russian regions so backward
that any comparison with Western standards was at once unfair and impossible?
With surprise and contempt the Berliners watched the attempts of Russian
soldiers to drill a hole in the wall in the hope that it would spout water just
as the faucet did over the kitchen sink. They were amazed by the readiness of
the Russian soldier to exchange an expensive wrist-watch for any old alarm clock
just because it was so much bigger. They were disgusted to see their living-room
changed into a butcher-shop as the Russians dragged animals up the stairs to be
killed on the carpet. They did not understand their persistence of using the
bathtub for a toilet and the toilet for washing their faces. They could not help
laughing over the disappointment of the Russian who washed his potatoes in the
toilet-bowl only to see them disappear as he pulled the lever. They saw with
regret the wrecked automobiles and bicycles littering the streets, demonstrating
the Russians' great love and little aptitude for things mechanical. They learned
to know the Russian's great fear of his superiors: to make a misbehaving soldier
run, it was only necessary to shout "Commissar" at the top of one's
lungs. They witnessed Russian soldiers marched off to prison, heavy ropes around
their bodies, the point of the bayonet between their shoulder blades, like in an
old war-picture of a hundred years back. They experienced day by day the wide
gulf that still separates the East from the West, as yet unbridgeable by any
ideology, crossable only by armed forces, and haphazardly kept together by the
permanence of terror.
Order was re-established in Berlin.
Russian soldiers had been buried where they had fallen, on the sidewalks, in the
center of the streets. Their graves had been lovingly cared for. Little white
fences had been placed around them. Flowers, and often the picture of the
deceased, were planted on the heap of earth covering them. Their remains were
now dug out to restore the streets to their original function, and were placed
into mass-graves at more appropriate places. Barriers were placed on every
important street corner. Smart Russian women in uniform, white gloves, their
bosom pushed up to the neck, regulated traffic by lifting or lowering toll-bars
for vehicles and individuals alike. Like other regulations modeled on the
Russian village, these traffic disturbances disappeared with the entry of the
Allied troops.
With order restored, pillage was
now directed from headquarters. The factories lost their machinery, the
warehouses all they contained. Even the tracks of the city railway were removed,
but had to be brought back at a later date. The street-cars were moved to
Russia. The Germans repaired previously discarded ones; but they, too, were
taken. Only the oldest, most dilapidated ones were left to Berlin.
With the entering of the Allied
troops about half of Berlin was freed of the Russians. The expropriations were
legalized, the removals were now being called reparations. The Russian troops
moved into barracks and bunkers formerly housing German troops. Their uniforms
seemed cleaner and they began to let their hair grow. But the more well-mannered
they became, the less could be seen of them. Their isolation is not complete, of
course; they can still be observed guarding the factories and offices that work
for them. They have their parades and patrols and also their time off. They
still plant their machine-guns on railway stations to check the papers of all
who pass. But there is no longer that one-sided "fraternization" of
the first months of the occupation.
III
Russia has lost in Germany, most
certainly in Berlin, notwithstanding all the apparent "good will" the
people show toward the Socialist Unity Party, Russia's German instrument. It is
not propaganda, nor a stubborn refusal to be disillusioned, which explains some
of the Berliners' "enthusiasm" for Russia's German policy. Behind the
"enthusiasm" hides fear, which is kept alive by an invisible terror
that may at any day come into the open.
On May Day 1948 there were nearly
three-quarters of a million people in the Lustgarten demonstration
called by the Russian-sponsored Socialist Unity Party. Apparently more than the
number of those who attended the Socialist demonstration at the Reichstag
building. Only two Russians in mufti, and one in uniform, shared the tribune
with Piek and his staff. Few Russians were seen along the route. The slogans
were all related to imagined German needs, and against the Marshall Plan. Hour
by hour the demonstrators passed the reviewing stand. Their shoutings, however,
had no spontaneity, but were directed by groups of claques near the
loudspeaker-system. The Communist-controlled Berlin police formed part of the
demonstration and received the loudest applause. Over and over again the
loudspeakers burst forth with "Long live the German people's police."
The Moscow-trained former Nazi officer, Markgraf, at that time Berlin's sole
police president, smiled down to the masses, coquettishly waving a red carnation
or clicking his heels in an earnest salute. Berlin's love for the police and the
love of the police for the Berliners seemed boundless and all-embracing.
The shabby clothes, torn shoes, and
hungry faces of the demonstrators made them appear like an army of desperate
beggars, out to invade the reservoirs of the rich. But they yelled for the
police, for the often-felt rubber truncheons, for the deadly order of the
party-state. Did the bottle of schnapps they received this morning go to their
heads? Of course not, for it was sold at once to the black market. The schnapps
was not a present but cost more than a weekly wage; by selling it they realized
a profit big enough to buy four loaves of bread. Maybe the sight of the large
brown sausages sold at various booths near the marching-route made them love the
world and all it contained? But taking the sausage meant to part with precious
ration-coupons and to face a meatless month. No, the enthusiasm for the police,
for the Communist Party, for Russia, was not the result of bribery; it was given
absolutely free, it came from the heart, a heart obsessed by fear.
The manipulated demonstrations of
the "people's will" are organized through a malignant net of
organizations. It is not up to the individual to decide whether or not to go.
With others he is assembled at the place of work or at his living-quarters. His
trade-union functionary, factory-representative, party-comrade, or house-warden,
will know if he missed the call, if he stayed away deliberately; and he may be
reprimanded or reported. Reported to whom? That's just it. Under the Nazis it
was clear, but now one doesn't really know. However, if the Russians should
become the absolute rulers, it may be expected that a bad record or a deficiency
of enthusiasm will reach the files of a new Gestapo. It is better to play safe,
to act and talk as is expected, or not to talk, just nod, and follow the
functionary.
Communist Party trustees, backed by
the Red Army, control factories still working, supervise all available jobs
whatever their nature, control the cooperatives and the municipal offices.
Although rations are small they must be bought. To live, one must work, even if
most work is of the make-believe kind. Some jobs qualify for ration-card Two,
others for ration-card Three, the most important jobs, as evaluated by the
Russian occupiers, for ration-card One. To get a ration-card a work-card is
needed. To keep the work-card, one must not oppose the policy and ideology of
the Socialist Unity Party.
In opposition to the planned
installation of a Western German government the Party called for a German
referendum on the question of national unity. That no one is against unity is
clear, though there may be some who do not care to show concern. That this is
not a German question at all is also clear. What will happen in Germany and
Berlin depends on the conflicts or agreements, between the great competing
powers. Nevertheless, the propaganda offices are busy on both sides and the
referendum is part of the Russian program. And then it starts: -The house-warden
knocks on the door: "Have you added your name to the list for the
referendum?" He comes back next day with the same question, and the day
thereafter. The question is asked at street corners, at the grocer's, in the
factories and offices, everywhere, by a great number of unpaid functionaries in
search of ration-card One, until everybody feels sure that he is watched, that
his indifference will not remain unnoticed. The list of names demanding the
referendum may be kept, checked, and gone over again, as soon as the Allied
powers have left, on the day of reckoning when the unreliables are purged.
Anyhow, it is not difficult to sign a name, and thus they sign-just in case.
Of course nobody is fooled by these
expressions of the people's will. The Party is not gauging its ideological
success but the amount of fear it has been able to inspire. By means of the
referendum, demonstrations, elections, declarations of all sorts, it measures
the degree of its power over the people. It knows that ideological control is of
small importance in an age which has devaluated all ideologies, where ideologies
are merely labels for the controlling powers of one or another set of
politicians who base their rule not on ideas but on an effective organization of
terror.
Life in the Russian sector begins
to resemble life under Nazi rule, including the arrests and disappearances of
oppositionists in nightly raids. Although as yet without uniform and with
restricted authority, a red "SS" is in formation. Discipline and the
leader principle are stressed, the party hierarchy and its system of privileges
has returned. With the division of the people into ration-card categories an
inexpensive army of functionaries and storm-troopers has been created. Being in
possession of a number One ration-card means to keep on living; outside this
category there is only slow starvation. The struggle for existence is a fight
for the proper ration-card, for the privilege of being used as policeman,
propagandist, informer, or executioner by the masters of the party-machine.
Russian expansion is based not on
consent but on force. It is a military and police affair exclusively,
notwithstanding all the doctrinaire concern with ideological issues, for these,
too, perform police functions, leading, as they do, to the early discovery of
deviations and nascent opposition. It is not the change in the economic
structure the Russians may introduce in Germany that causes concern, but the
political-social structure of their party-state. For the Berliners the
"Iron Curtain" hides no secrets. They have traveled across it, their
relatives are living there, visiting them from time to time, either legally or
illegally. Uncensored letters reach Berlin. They know that the conditions in
city and country do not differ from the miserable conditions in the Western
Zones, that Berlin merely reflects the whole of the territory that was once
Germany. Furthermore, some of them have been with the Nazi armies in Russia,
some returned as prisoners of war, looking like the inmates of Belsen and
Buchenwald in their last stages of development. Local experiences are not their
only criteria. But because of these experiences all that is Russian takes on a
particularly sinister character.
The immediate situation, however,
calls for duplicity. As long as there is a chance to pledge allegiance to the
West, the chance is taken in the illusory hope that this may influence the
decision of the Western powers to stay in Berlin. Simultaneously, the Russians
are supported wherever necessary, in order not to arouse their wrath, in case
the city should be theirs completely. As there are no escapes for the masses,
their attitudes change with their masters. Democratic Berlin will be even more
"democratic" as soon as the basis for its current democracy- four
power competition-is removed. Meanwhile, people can do no more than bewail their
reluctance to follow suit at the first great exodus to the Western zones, at the
earliest rumors of a possible Berlin crisis. Now they arc trapped, to be sold
out if so convenient, or to be used in a kind of test-case for the larger issues
at stake. Those who do not live by politics will prefer to do as they are told,
no matter who does the telling. The Western-oriented politicians will, at best,
become refugees. In their majority they will probably crowd still more the
already crowded Russian concentration camps. In any case, German preferences do
not count; the present flood of brave slogans about the Berliners' valiant
refusal to bow to the new dictatorship is only silly, facing, as Berlin does, an
army judged able, in case of war, of overrunning the whole of Germany within a
few days.
IV
The political issues that seemingly
agitate the Berliners only indicate their own impotence. Their interest in
politics is waning. They would, no doubt, support any power, and any cause, in
exchange for bread and security. They would even try to forget their early
experiences with the Russians. But no bread and no security is forthcoming. It
is the obvious poverty of the Russians, their strange primitiveness, their crude
terroristic methods, their inability to give, and their need to take where
hardly anything is left to take, that makes the Germans prefer the West. Even if
nothing is to be expected from either side, still there is a greater familiarity
with the Western world. There is also the strong suspicion that the Bolshevik
colossus rests upon feet of clay and that, notwithstanding possible initial
successes, it would not last in a prolonged war. It is not so much hunger for
revenge, as the desire to escape the camp of the defeated, which motivates the
German sympathies- such as they are-for the West.
However, no real turn to the West
is possible. Victors behave as such; even where no great gains can be realized
the victorious gestures will be maintained. These gestures alone confront the
Berliners, removed as they are from the bargain-counter of international
diplomacy, where special claims historically and otherwise, are framed in terms
of coal and iron. France's anxiety over a possible German revival is not shared
by her occupation troops, who recognize its baselessness merely by looking
around. No fear-determined brutality accompanies their rule. Only the French
officer behaves as arrogantly in Berlin as did the Nazi officer in Paris. And in
the French desire to demonstrate their superiority the Germans may recognize
their own behavior of better days. It is not a wise girl who refuses a French
soldier a dance in the Amusement Park; she may very well get her face slapped.
One must be careful in the use of one's language when facing the French
interrogator, since a real or imagined lack of respect may lead to painful
consequences. In general, however, the French behave toward the Germans in
Berlin as they would if they met them in Paris. In their persistent enmity they
are like all the other Western people who endured the Nazi occupation.
Apparently, they are not as yet finished with the war and their previously
suffered humiliation still looks for compensation.
Only the British soldiers attempt
to make themselves inconspicuous, provided they are sober, and so long as they
are on their own. But they are forced to do a lot of marching and shouting.
Their officers stick to themselves in Germany as once in India. Barbed wire
around their compounds, toll-gates, and many guards secure their isolation. They
bring their wives and children to Berlin and live their English-way-of-life as
if they were at home. The privates turn to German girls, which brings them into
contact with the population. They are no longer feared but envied for their
better food and happier outlook.
The presence of the French and
British is largely ignored, however, as it is clear that only two great powers
determine Berlin's status. America means many things to the Berliners. It means
relatives and friendly organizations that send food and clothing. It means
coffee and cigarettes on the black market. It means work and sales. It means a
hamburger with a G.I. in the Titania Palast, and well-filled garbage
cans for the scavengers. For some it provides the unfounded hope for social
solidarity and for a turn away from the present trend of totalitarianism and
war. For others it means effective opposition to the East and the certainty of
war. For most, however, America is only the other side of the coin which,
however thrown and however it will fall, spells doom for Europe in general and
for Berlin in particular.
Although deeply involved in Germany
and Berlin, the occupation army knows how to keep its distance from the
defeated. The isolation of the Americans is perhaps even more complete than that
of the British. They live their American-way-of-life in heavily guarded
compounds, comprising large territories in pleasant natural settings. They have
their own churches, schools, and kindergartens; their own movies, concerts,
lectures, restaurants and stores. No German foot is to set there, except on
missions of service. As distinct from the British, no program of austerity
interferes with the Americans' pleasures. All less desirable activities are
performed by Germans; Polish guards watch over them, their unbombed quarters are
inaccessible to all but those with proper papers. Security has been developed
both into a great art and a great science. To judge by the weapons displayed and
by the red tape employed, the life of each American seems to be in constant
danger. Even the Fräuleins need a "social pass" attesting to
their physical health, which was in former times required only of prostitutes.
From another view however, all this isolation seems not at all queer, for it
corresponds to the division of rich and poor that sets up barriers everywhere.
The Americans in Berlin may be looked upon as a kind of new bourgeoisie, more
sharply divided from the slum-dwellers than the bourgeoisie of old.
Of course, business closes the gap;
the coffee from the States must be sold, valuables which escaped the Russians
must be bought, and the requirements of the elevated social position demand a
great amount of German labor. But work is fantastically cheap. Prior to the
currency reform the weekly pay for any category of work did not exceed the
German Mark equivalent of ten American cigarettes, that is four cents, as the
P.X. sells the carton for eighty cents.
Nevertheless, the U.S.A. feeds part
of Berlin. The Americans never tire of pointing to their deliveries and to the
fact that they themselves manage without German-produced foods. Like the nation
as a whole, so her citizens separately feel like philanthropists, the more to be
admired since it is the former enemy they benefit. The hungry beggars have no
choice but to be grateful, and their excessive submissiveness supports the
conqueror's illusion of generosity. But there is no Jove for the Americans. The
block-busters are not forgotten. The Americans are preferred because of the
crumbs that fall from their tables and because they are businesslike people.
They buy where others steal, they sell where others give. And even if the
end-result-absolute impoverishment and complete exploitation-should be the same,
the process to this end, in terms of personal experiences, seems not as terrible
as the lawless past.
American generosity brings a bitter
smile to the lips of the Berliner. He knows quite well what his rations are, and
he knows the black market prices. His bitterness on this point, however, does
not differ from his feelings toward his own countrymen, the farmer for instance,
or toward the Displaced Persons and the Western businessmen who are engaged in
black market activities. He cannot find any satisfaction in the thought that the
black market must find its end as soon as Germany is emptied of all the
valuables that still command a price on the world-market, for he needs the black
market and is by necessity a part of it. The temporary black market depression
in the wake of the currency-reform did not help the Berliners much, as the
"cold war" prevented them from profiting by the farmers' and
store-keepers' new confidence in the freshly printed money.
The smile released by the
propaganda for Democracy, however has no bitterness at all. It can even turn
into a hearty laugh if the question of the re-education of the Germans is
raised. It is understood, to be sure, that an army is exempt from democracy,
otherwise it could not be an army, and that an occupation army in particular
cannot serve a lesson in democracy. It is rather the propaganda in newspaper,
news-reel, and radio, that is found so amusing. Every word uttered in favor of
democracy is at once contradicted by the facts of life. It is not the Nazi
education of the past, having lost its dubious meaning long before the
occupation, which explains the Berliners' obvious reluctance to take the dealers
in democracy seriously; it is the close resemblance of their present life to
that under the Nazi dictatorship. Of course they are supposed to pay for their
sins of the past before being allowed to enjoy the fullness of the democratic
life. The propaganda merely contains the promise of rewards for present-day good
behavior, just as the flesh-pots of the Nazis had to be earned first by
countless sacrifices and terrible suffering. But for too long the Berliners have
lived on promises, and no longer do they trust in words. They are not cynical
and disillusioned, as the observers say; they are merely sick of phrases totally
unrelated to their actual situation. They do not see a choice between democracy
and dictatorship but merely hope for the lowest possible degree of the
terroristic rule of which they have had so much.
It is found increasingly difficult
to oppose the Nazi observation that power alone determines who is to rule and
live, and who is to be ruled and destroyed. The anti-Nazi cannot help feeling
that authoritarianism has survived the Nazi rule and that the difference between
oppressor and liberator is rather small. Hate and disgust grows, and dissipates
into despair. It cannot lead to a revival of nationalism, as the material base
for the latter has been bombed away. To get out of the country, rather than to
revive it, is the dream of its ambitious people. They are no longer able,
however, to feel embarrassment over the long Nazi dictatorship, and they no
longer brood over the atrocities committed. They have grown cold to all but
their own misery; and to tell them, as is often done, that they "only got
what they were asking for," causes no anger but only tired gestures of
resignation. Whatever they were and whatever they have done, just now they only
desire to live and to be left alone.
V
The desire to be left alone has
nothing to do with the current issues of self-government, national unity,
Western federation, constitutions, or the color of flags. It simply means to be
left out of all activities concerned with such matters. It is the desire to
escape the manipulations of politicians, profiteers, professional ideologists,
and also the pressure of the enchanted minority defending traditional values. It
is a vague longing for a new start, unaffected by the past, and an activity with
no other issues than those of making bread and of eating it undisturbed. The
desire is illusory but it indicates the prevailing state of mind. To be left
alone implies also the wish to escape the war now in the making. The anti-war
attitude is not based on theories but on direct experience in the bombed cities
and on the battlefields of the world. They have learned to place life above all
those considerations which are evoked in the justification of war. They are at
any rate much too busy trying to keep alive, to be concerned with the larger
problems of world politics. They do not really care about the changes of
uniforms so long as they are able to use the night for sleep.
Sleep is important, undisturbed
sleep of even greater importance, as the Berliners found out in the restless
nights during the war. To go to bed with the careless assurance that they will
rise again in the morning- this ordinary experience became the greatest desire
of the bombed sleep walkers. To sleep without the constant fear of death meant
more than victory or defeat. Sleep is not just the mind and body at rest, it
shortens the days, it helps against the cold, it is a substitute for food,
preserves energy, and is the hiding place of misery.
Food is another of the Berliners'
great obsessions, and sleep overcomes it only partly and temporarily. The
individual awake is the personification of hunger. His mind is occupied with
food and the question how to get it. All other thoughts are secondary and rather
meaningless as long as the primary need remains unsatisfied. The rationed food
is no problem. It is so little, and is sold at stable prices, so that anyone who
works can pay for it. The only question it arouses is whether to eat it all at
once or to distribute it over the larger part of the week. The answer depends on
the individual's connections on the black market and on his ability to pay its
prices.
The search for food goes on
relentlessly, in and outside of Berlin. For food anything expendable will be
exchanged. For a few pounds of potatoes great hardships are endured; hours of
standing in line for a railway ticket; the brutal rush for a front place at the
gate; the struggle for a place inside the train or even for hanging on its
sides; the dodging of the police, and the long marches from farm to farm.
Whoever cannot leave the city is busy visiting the grocery stores and black
market centers so as not to be late for the last delivery of bread or butter.
They are always on the run for food, always asking for information about food,
always excited about food, always thinking in terms of food, and all the while
hungry to the bones.
There are many types of hunger, and
the Berliners have experienced them all. There is the hunger for specific
commodities that disappear in times of war. There is the desire for a balanced
and pleasant diet, instead of stuffing the belly with whatever is on hand. There
were the rations during the Hitler regime, which were seldom sufficient, and
became hunger rations toward the end of the war. And then came the absolute
hunger with the collapse of the distribution system during the siege of Berlin.
To survive this period meant to eat whatever was found on the streets, in the
ruins, and during frantic searches in abandoned stores. Wounded horses were
ripped apart as soon as they had fallen. Most of the people turned butchers;
like ant-heaps they hovered over the carcasses. They hunted for dogs and cats,
picking from the asphalt what was red and bloody, even the innards of men blown
to bits by artillery fire. Only to live through this ordeal, to be alive when
the war was over, to enjoy once more a normal life, and to eat as much as one
liked.
But the hunger remained; it was now
organized and categorized. Former class divisions lost their meaning before the
food-commissions, only to have their illegal comeback on the black market. The
law made new classifications in terms of ration-cards with different numbers of
calories, dividing the population into groups that were to live and function,
Others that were to die off slowly, and still others destined to die quickly.
The counting in calories may be good for the statistician and it may make easy
the sociologist's comparative studies in living standards, but to the hungry it
is merely the strangely expressed verdict determining their punishments down to
the death-sentence. But the judges are not fair, the sentences are not clear.
What does it mean, for instance, to speak of the calories of ten pounds of
potatoes if half of them are inedible, or of the calory-content of one pound of
sugar if half of it consists of an undefinable dust? What does the rationed meat
mean, if week after week no meat at all reaches the market, or if it turns up in
the form of ground intestines mixed with flour, or is substituted by a herring
nobody knows how to fry for lack of fat?
Not even the highest ration covers
human needs; it must be supplemented with black market food and self-raised
garden products. All other categories are only names for various starvation
levels. They not only create new classes but also split the families into
feuding units. The permanence of hunger makes sharing impossible. All sociality
disappears; everyone holds on to his own, or tries to hold on. Some eat their
rations fast, others slowly; envy and hate develop merely by watching people
eat. Some men ruin their health quickly so that their children may eat, others
starve their wives and children to retain their own strength. Suspicion rules,
extras are kept secret, food is eaten in hiding, dragged into a corner to be
devoured in animal-fashion. People are nervous, ill-willed, ready to quarrel on
the slightest pretext and more than often inclined to kill. Inequality within
the setting of general want is the crudest form of inequality, the most
corrupting, the ugliest, and the most vicious method of control.
If there were a sign that the
hunger might end it would lose half of its terror. But the many years of
repeated disappointments extinguished all hope. Even if the situation should
change suddenly, the people would not believe in its permanence. They would
merely eat themselves sick, would hoard what they could not get down, accumulate
enormous quantities of food; it would take a long time before food would cease
to be an obsession. Abundance, however, occurs only in their dreams; the
recalling of the far-off past seems like a fairy-tale of well being. Lucky are
the children born into this misery. They do not know about other than the meager
rations, the substitutes, the skimmed milk if any, and the black dry bread. They
do not know about candies, chocolates and fruits, and often refuse these strange
things if they are offered to them. The world of hunger, cold, and want is the
only world they know about. With their toes blue in the sharp wind, they run
about laughingly like other children. With their bare feet in wooden soles they
play their games undisturbed. Their carefree attitude misleads the wellfed
visitors to consider the claims of misery to be grossly exaggerated. The doctors
know differently, of course; they measure, weigh, and keep records and offer
proof that these children are not like other children, for they weigh less, grow
to lesser heights, and die sooner when sick.
The older children are realists in
the world of hunger. Their early life belonged to Adolf Hitler; no other ideas
but those of the Nazis entered their minds. No one contradicted their childish
empty talk. Theirs was the future-supposedly. And then all this collapsed. What
was good became bad, what was once laudable was now cursed; if no one dared to
oppose their childish arrogance, now no one seemed to care for them at all. They
were either a burden, or a source for additional food, which they gathered by
becoming smalltime operators on the black market. Some no longer had parents;
others who had, no longer cared for them. They needed help which no one could
provide; so they tried to help themselves and sometimes they succeeded.
Disregarding the ever-present
propaganda for the prevention of diseases, girls look for soldiers. They have
been raped, why shouldn't they sell? What is all this talk about morals anyway?
Of course, syphilis is not worth a pack of cigarettes. But neither is it good to
be healthy and hungry. All is a gamble anyway, the good often die quicker than
the bad. There is no love and no romance, it is all business on the barter
level. There is little prostitution in the old sense of the word although there
are still prostitutes around the Alexanderplatz. If enough buyers were
at hand, prostitution would be general. Sex is a way of getting food as good as
any other, and often the only way. The escapades of wife and daughter in search
of food are disregarded; love completely disarmed, faces hunger.
The adolescents are frightfully
realistic about the new relationship of hunger and love, of existence and
sociality. No values other than material ones arouse their interest. They are
practitioners of the empty life. The immediate personal gain in terms of
things-edible, usable-is their only concern. Narrow-minded, without scruples,
they turn their cold egotistical eyes upon the world of rubble in search for
plunder left by the plunderers of yesterday. And since so little is left their
selfishness is miserly; not even toward themselves do they know generosity. They
calculate, count, ration, hoard, to secure their mere existence in spite of
everything and everybody.
Hunger shows; it drives the smiles
from the faces and tightens the skin on the bones. The flesh turns
yellowish-brown and eyes sink into their sockets. There is an irritated tired
look in the eyes, and sadness and anger around the mouth. The backs are bent and
the steps arc unsure as if in hestitation before the grave. When hunger comes,
it appears publicly only in its early stages and in some cases not at all.
Permanent hunger makes one indifferent, even to the self. The hungry hide like
wounded animals in their caves. Starvation is not a street-sight; it doesn't
offer itself to curious visitors. The people on the streets, and particularly on
the still comfortable streets, frequented by the even more comfortable visitors,
arc still struggling against starvation with all the weapons at their command.
If they are hungry, they rush about not to get hungrier. They still care about
their appearance, dress up brush, wash and mend not to add moral humiliation to
the physical dilemma. The starving rush no longer. They do not clutter the
streets; they have no shoes to walk in and no reason to be seen. They stay at
home, in their rooms, live in their beds, or in the wards of hospitals,
apathetically awaiting either a miracle or death.
| Partisan Review October 1948 |
The Council Communist
Archive |